Letter 11

"In the Beginning God Created" and the Big Bang

Take a three-year-old who points at the sky and asks, “And what was before that?” You answer, and they ask about your answer. And so on, until you get stuck. Every child discovers this exercise on their own, and every physicist and every theologian gets stuck in exactly the same place. The sentence “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” and the sentence “There was a moment in the universe when everything was astonishingly dense and hot” both stand on the same last step, beyond which it is hard to point.

Where this touches science

That the universe expanded from a dense, hot state is science, among the solid findings. We see it from three independent directions: galaxies are moving apart from one another, there is a background radiation that fills the whole sky like a lukewarm echo, and the ratio of light elements in the universe (hydrogen, helium) matches precisely the calculation for those first minutes. The Big Bang model stands on steady legs.

But notice what it does not say. It does not describe an “explosion” inside an existing space, but an expansion of space itself. And more importantly: the question “what came before” or “what caused it” steps outside the bounds of what we can measure today. There are interesting directions — a cyclic universe, a multiverse, a quantum fluctuation of the void — but these are speculation, hypotheses that there is still no way to decide between by experiment. And when someone asks “why is there anything at all rather than nothing,” that is already philosophy in the full sense of the word. Science describes wonderfully how what exists unfolded; why there is anything to unfold at all is a question of another kind.

What tradition offers

Genesis opens with a moment of absolute beginning. That is a strong claim, and not self-evident: there were cultures that imagined an eternal world without a beginning, and others that told of gods born out of a primordial chaos that was already there. The very idea of “something from nothing,” that the world begins from a point and was not always, resonates for many.

This Jewish voice is one within a chorus. Christians read the same verse as the opening of their own story, and in the word “created” generations of thinkers heard the idea of creation out of nothing. In the Qur’an the world too opens with a Creator’s command. Greek thought, for its part, argued over whether matter has any beginning at all. And a secular person can read the first chapter of Genesis as early human poetry about the wonder of existence itself, without accepting any claim about a creator. These four readings do not cancel one another. Each approaches, from a different angle, the same last wall behind which it is hard to see.

What all these traditions share is interesting: the assumption that the first moment has meaning, that it is worth pausing on and asking about. Not “where did we come from” as a technical fact, but as a question one cannot let go.

Why it matters

Because the place where we get stuck is the same. The physicist who reaches the edge of the equation, the child who points at the sky, and the person who reads “In the beginning God created” — all three stand before the same step beneath which there is no further stage to point to. Science gives us an astonishing description of what happened after. The question of why there was anything to begin from at all stays open for everyone, equally.

It is neither comforting nor threatening. It is simply a point at which all our tools, the scientific and the religious alike, point outward beyond themselves.

And this is exactly the question we keep circling here, only in different languages. Cosmology describes the first moment in one language, Genesis describes it in another, and both stop on the same step. The fact that cultures far from one another arrived at the same edge is itself a small hint of what this project is after: one reality that keeps appearing through many tongues, where the work is to bridge between them, not to choose one.

So here is a question for you: when you reach that last step yourself, what do you feel there — curiosity, unease, or something else entirely?

The newsletter

One big question, once a week

A short letter on one question from science, philosophy, and tradition, ending in a question to you. No payment, no ads.

Subscribe to the letters →